Hello,
Hope October is going well for you. For me, classes are going well. Students are excited to be back in person, just finished first set of exams and papers.
Was on a podcast recently where two side were debating the pro/con of synchronous meetings.
1) Listen to the podcast here. You'll like it. The first voice is mine where I seem to uniformly call all meetings boring. Oh, sorry. . must be thinking outloud.
2) Yes, there are too many meetings. A few blog posts I've written on why I think this:
3) It's also been fun to get feedback from people I know, trust, respect on the importance of meetings. I am not a misanthrope, I do believe there are some good reasons for meetings:
Building trust, alignment, and problem-solving together
Brainstorming, early-stage innovation
Smoothing over misunderstanding, and being a human
Getting to know new people; creating a foundation for a relationship
Having fun, experience serendipity
However, I believe we should hold a high standard for meetings. Namely,
Invite only people critical to the meeting; for everyone else, send meeting minutes
Send the materials, pre-reads in advance
Set a clear agenda of the goals, expected outcomes
Give people the opportunity to "opt-out" by doing work, helping out in other ways
Type up clear meeting minutes when finished
Ensure that action items are completed, so it's not groundhog day
Consultants need meetings to get things done, so trust me, I know some of this might sound heretical. Feel free to give feedback/pushback after listening to the podcast here.
John
jkstrategy@consultantsmind.com
I finished a project with a company within the top 20 of the Fortune 500 list. It may be just the HQ group I was working with, but this issue was probably endemic to the whole company. Meetings arranged by the client were mostly collosal wastes of time. They created no agendas and distributed no minutes - ever. Meetings rarely, if ever, resulted in action items. If action items were assigned, the results were never reported out; if you wanted to know the results, you had to track down the right person to ask. Incredibly frustrating. Fortunately for the company, its market success was not reliant upon the competency of its HQ staff.